Fiduciary Is Fun!
(a.k.a. I heart taxes)
(a.k.a. I heart taxes)
At first, it doesn’t seem as if this title makes too much sense. Afterall, 401k plans are tax advantaged vehicles and only file informational tax returns. There is no tax owed by a qualified retirement plan. And this is certainly technically correct.
However, most plans now have Roth features which allow employees to have their deferrals taxed prior to them being deposited into the plan. The advantage to Roth is that even though the deferrals are taxed initially, all future earnings on those deferrals can be withdrawn (with a few minor restrictions) tax free by the employee. Pretty niffy. Even so, the vast majority of 401k deferrals (and 403b deferrals) are pretax, meaning that employees will pay ordinary income tax on the deferrals AND all earnings when they withdraw those funds.
So tax planning for your retirement plan is really more of an employee issue versus an employer issue, and what a planning opportunity it is! I am working with one of my clients now in anticipation of conducting employee meetings in early January to focus specifically on this issue.
Some details: After the passage of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act in late 2017, the marginal tax rates for most Americans dropped. The marginal rate is only 12% for a married couple earning no more than $78,950, and it only increases to 22% if that couple earns no more than $168,400. That covers a lot of young couples in this country! In fact, my client has the majority of their employees under 30 and earning around $40,000. Most are basically in the 12% marginal bracket. Is it worth getting the traditional 401k tax break for deferrals for such a group? I would argue NO.
People tend to think Roth or no-Roth and leave it at that. I believe there are some pretty compelling arguments to be made that when employees are early in their career and earnings are more modest that Roth makes absolutely good sense. Later in their career when they might be in the 35% or 37% tax bracket, if they are so fortunate, then traditional 401k deferrals might make sense. You can always change!
So what makes the most sense for your employees? What are you advising them as you enter into a new year? Just as importantly, what is your advisor saying? And does your advisor have the skill set to even make such recommendations?
If you would like an additional perspective and some thoughts on how to position your employees for long term financial success, give me a call. I would love to visit about optimizing tax benefits. Just the thought makes me warm all over!
Pete Welsh a/k/a 401kGuy
I really enjoy working with small business owners - individuals who seemingly face incredible odds and yet still find a way to succeed. Helping such individuals is probably one of the most rewarding aspects of my role as a financial advisor.
Small business owners often have a hard time distinguishing between themselves and their business. After all, they have poured their time and sweat into making the business successful and such devotion can often come at a cost to themselves and their families. I have new client that fits this profile.
I was referred to the business owner because he has “30 employees and needs a 401k plan.” This is indeed true as the company is 10 years old, running successfully, has a relatively loyal workforce and has reached the point where a company sponsored retirement plan makes sense. However, there is so much more to the story.
While getting to know this particular business owner as we discussed options for a company retirement plan, it turns out that he has diligently been reinvesting S-Corp profits into the business. He has organically grown the business and as a consequence is currently debt free. And although this sounds great, it has come at a huge cost.
He has no savings to speak of. He has no retirement funds. He does have a wife and two children under 6, but no life insurance. And amazingly, or maybe not, he has no estate planning documents and no idea what would happen if he passed away other than that his wife, who is not active in the business, would get 100% of a business she does not know how to run.
He has been running his business with a singular focus and has not stepped back to realize that his business and his personal life are two very different things and have different needs. When we had our first planning meeting with his wife present, I can assure you that she recognizes the difference!
So, what’s next? In this case we are examining the corporate returns, balance sheet, and cash flow statement to rework how the business is capitalized and to allow him to begin taking some money out so that he and his family stop living like paupers. We are running life insurance illustrations to protect his family should something happen to him. And we are examining buy/sell options should something happen as well. In short, a top to bottom review.
If you are business owner who has not taken the time to consider both your business and your personal life holistically, know that you are not alone. But also know, that help is available! For a comprehensive plan, give me a call at your convenience!
Pete Welsh a/k/a 401Guy
This fall I have conducted a number of Financial Education Meetings at employee worksites. Several of my clients have strong participation in their 401k plans, so traditional enrollment meetings have not been needed. Rather, we have pivoted to putting together financial education meetings that span many fronts.
You might be thinking at this point that the point of this blog post is to stress how important it is to reinforce budgeting, debt management, education planning, emergency funds, comprehensive insurance reviews, etc. And the list goes on. And while all those items are important, critically important, I am not going to discuss them here.
Rather, what has been interesting to me and what I do want to cover is how I have worked with the HR departments at my clients to get a better understanding of their overall benefits programs as I prep for my financial planning meetings. The benefit offerings at an employer can often be a seamless web and to discuss one offering in isolation of the others is to not fully convey the value of all the programs and how they work together.
For example, when I cover the need to review insurance, I like to know what the employer already provides. Is their term life insurance in place? How about some short and/or long term disability coverage? Knowing the answers to these questions allows me to piece together multiple components of the protection story and help the employees understand that their employer has already taken steps to help them out.
Another place I spend time is understanding the Employee Assistance Program. When I discuss the need for employees to have wills, health care directives, and power of attorneys, I often point out that the EAP offered by their employer is available at no cost (generally) to help employees get started on getting these documents in place. These are only a couple of examples. There are many more to be considered.
I generally find that taking a comprehensive approach to the benefit programs leaves the employees feeling more empowered and confident as well as more appreciative of their employer. It is a shame when an employer and their benefits broker put together comprehensive programs that are underappreciated and/or underutilized. Everyone leaves shortchanged in these situations.
If you are an employer looking for an adviser that takes a comprehensive approach to all your benefit programs beyond just the retirement plan, please give me a call. I would love to discuss how we might work together.
Pete Welsh a/k/a 401KGuy
I started working with a new client last week. The initial conversations were around their desire to establish a retirement plan for their small but growing company. The company was started in 2014 by the 2 founders and is in construction. They have now matured to the point where expanding their benefits offering makes sense and they want to reward the employees who were with them in the beginning and attract new talent. All of this is pretty straight forward, and we will be starting up a new plan for them in the next few weeks.
The interesting part of the conversation occurred after we discussed the establishment of the retirement plan. I asked the two owners about the company and what planning they had done. In particular, I asked about their growth plans, as well as their exit plans, including if one should die unexpectedly. They did not have good answers, but their answers were not that unusual for successful entrepreneurs. They have been working hard at growing the business, making sure that it’s moving forward, but not stepping back to consider longer term opportunities and risks.
One item on which we spent considerable time involved what would happen to the business if one of them were to die unexpectedly? They did admit that they had brought this up to one another in the past, but never moved forward to take action or to visit with anyone about it. When I asked them to “give me a rough number” on what they thought the business was worth today, they both said “$1million” at the same time. This means that if one of the partners were to die that the other would need $500,000 to buy out that interest. That’s $500,000 in cash, today. How much more might be needed in 3, 5, or 10 more years? And neither has the $500,000 needed now.
Additionally, we talked about how the founders have been reinvesting most of their earnings into the business to help it grow. This is great in many respects, but by doing so they have not been doing any planning for themselves. The business is everything, but we all know it might not always be. So the conversation quickly moved to how we can begin to de-risk their personal situations by initiating some financial planning for themselves.
In total, it was a good conversation with numerous next steps. They were concerned where to begin on a couple of action items and I told them that I could work directly with their CPA and Attorney to get the ball moving on the buy/sell agreement. I’m putting together some quotes for consideration and gave them a list of items I need to begin working on their personal situations. By breaking everything down into steps and charting a path forward, both partners felt empowered about taking control.
In many respects, that is how I see my job – empowering you as the business owner to take the steps you know need to be done but are unsure where to start. Give me a call at your convenience and we can begin taking those next steps together.
Pete Welsh a/k/a 401kGuy
The qualified plan world is tricky, and if you are a regular reader of my blog, you undoubtedly already know this. After 25 years working with retirement plans, I like to think that I have seen many if not most of the problems, and I have. However, sometimes I forget about a problem for a long time until it resurfaces. I am working on one such problem now.
In the tax exempt (or 403(b)) retirement world, it is not uncommon for employees to have individual contracts with companies such as TIAA, AIG, Lincoln, or other providers of tax-sheltered accounts. However, what has happened over the last many years is the organizations that sponsor these plans have begun to move toward what I’ll call “single contracts” for their retirement plans. Rather than have each employee maintain their own retirement contract, the employer holds all the retirement assets in a single contract for the benefit of the employees. This is how the 401k world works.
The problem on which I am currently working involves an organization that moved from these individual accounts to a single contract. What is interesting is that when they moved they did not, and could not, require all the individuals to move their money into the single contract. Some employees did, but many did not. When the new provider began recordkeeping the plan, they did not account for several employees who had these individual contracts as they could not track them on their recordkeeping system.
So, what’s the big deal? Where is the problem? In this case, the employer moved to the new provider when they had less than 100 employees. Over time the firm grew, but not to the point where they needed an audit, or so they thought, and I know you know what’s coming next….
When you add in the individuals who were not being tracked because they had individual accounts, the plan did, in fact, become subject to the Form 5500 audit requirement. An honest mistake, you might say. No big deal. An honest foul. We’ll fix it going forward
Ya, well, the DOL doesn’t quite see it that way. The penalty is $150 per day up to $50,000 for each Form 5500 when the auditor’s report is deficient. Suffice to say that if the audit isn’t even done, it’s deficient.
What are we doing now? Well, I am working on becoming the advisor on the plan because the current advisor didn’t even know about this. I am also working with the attorney who has been hired to engage the DOL and IRS to seek to mitigate penalties. We will soon be working with the plan’s recordkeeper to amend returns, and we are obviously reaching out to a CPA firm. This is a huge mess for the employer, who quite honestly is just trying to execute on its tax-exempt mission and doesn’t really have money to fix this.
Concerned that maybe your advisor doesn’t fully understand the myriad of rules that apply to your plan? Give me a call and let’s have a conversation. Problems have a way of sneaking up on you!
Pete Welsh a/k/a 401kGuy
Today I met with a client of mine for a committee review of the plan. It went as these meetings normally go – a review of plan level activity, a discussion of the fund line-up, how were the recent employee meetings, etc. All very pleasant with a good discussion.
At one point in the review, the owner/patriarch of the company asked “I see we have some employees invested in bonds. Why? They shouldn’t be. Can you let me know who, so I can speak to them. Fixed income is not where they should be putting their money.” To be clear, he was saying this with the best of intentions. He is universally loved by his employees and truly has only their best interests in mind. However….
It is not uncommon for employees to stop by an HR office or CFO’s office, or even the founder’s office to ask “what should I do with my 401k money?” It is also not unusual for caring individuals who occupy those seats to want to help employees with their money. But is this the right thing to do?
The problem with giving such advice, of course, is that you open yourself up to downside risk. It is almost never the case that people sue when things go well. They sue when things go wrong. So when an officer of the firm “helps”, “assists”, “advices”, etc. an employee on where to invest his or her money, downside risk is created when things do not go right
In fact, I believe there already exists a fair amount of risk as our Baby Boomers move into retirement and realize that their nest eggs are not what they need them to be. How easy would it be for an employee to look back on some “advice” their employer gave them years ago about investing and argue that but for that advice they would be in a better place with their retirement account?
Well, after we all had some fun in our meeting today challenging the owner’s actual knowledge of investing, we agreed on a better approach. As an advisor who serves in a fiduciary capacity, I am actually licensed to give “investment advice for a fee.” Since we were able to quickly conclude I was the only one so licensed, we agreed that in the future employees would be directed to me to discuss their investments and how to invest.
Are you an employer who struggles with helping employees invest? Is your advisor licensed to provide “investment advice for a fee?” Not sure? Give me a call and we can have a discussion about how to do the right thing without exposing the company to risk.
Pete Welsh a/k/a 401kGuy
In the financial advisor world, we get numerous opportunities throughout the year to take a break, attend a conference, learn a few things, and recharge the batteries a bit. This week I had a chance to do just that, and was able to listen to a very impressive speaker discuss “Trust” – what is it, how do we earn it, and what’s it mean.
The speaker was Dr. Jeff Hancock, Professor of Communications at Stanford University and Director of Stanford’s Center for Computational Social Science. Suffice to say, he is a pretty bright guy, and what he does is study human psychology and the meaning of trust. I didn’t even know that was a thing until this week, but after listening to him, I am glad the we have someone like him.
Dr. Hancock’s work is even more important in a world where many of us are inundated regularly through digital information. A thousand years ago, “trust” was more or less limited to those in our small communities. Maybe we had to trust someone a town over, but that was it for most folks. Now we have to trust, or not trust, information from all over the world that is hitting us relentlessly all day. How do we deal with this?
In the most succinct way possible, Dr. Hancock distilled trust into this simple statement – “Trust is the confidence in one’s expectations.” Beautiful, right? If I have a high confidence in what I am hearing, seeing, reading, etc., then I trust it. He was discussing trust in general, but, of course, I couldn’t help relate this back to what I do – assist employers and employees with their retirement plan.
All this made me think about the trust employers and employees have in their own 401k plan, and can they “trust it.” The first step in such an analysis would naturally be what do they expect from it. Without expectations there can be no confidence, which means there can be no trust.
So I ask you, what are your expectations for your 401k plan? How much confidence do you have that those expectations will be met? If you are struggling at all with these two questions, then how can you trust your retirement plan? And if you are struggling with these questions, how much do your employees trust the company’s retirement plan?
I have a thought. A good place to begin building up trust in your plan is to sit down with a competent advisor to clearly understand what expectations you should have for your retirement plan. Once you begin building trust in your plan, you can help your employees build trust in the plan, which is really another way of saying you would help your employees build trust in their future. And isn’t that a good thing?
Need help beginning this journey? Give me a call, I would love to work with you…trust me!
Pete Welsh a/k/a 401kGuy
This is historically the time of year when employers begin to review their retirement plans on the off chance that changes should be made in anticipation of the new year. It’s a good time to do it, as there are multiple timelines that can work to limit an employer’s flexibility with respect to what can be changed as the year begins to expire. Modifying a Safe Harbor 401k plan is just one example.
It’s also the case that by this time of year an employer’s financial picture starts to come into clearer focus. Lots of unknowns in January and February, but by September and October a “good year” or a “bad year” is taking shape. Let’s talk about the Good Year.
Let’s suppose you are an employer who is expected to have a very good 2019 and you would like to give back to your employees for being a part of that success. You could do lots of things, of course. A cash bonus in January to everyone in the same amount is not unusual. However, let’s say you want to do something different, like make a profit sharing contribution to your retirement plan. The good news is that every 401k plan is also a profit sharing plan. Surprised? Well, it’s true.
The next question you might ask yourself if you do decide to make a profit sharing contribution is “how will it be allocated?” And that is a very good question! The answer as you might expect is that it depends. The most common way to do this is “pro rata based on compensation.” It’s pretty fair and the default for many plans. But let’s say that isn’t sitting well with you. Let’s say some employees contributed more to the year’s results than other. Let’s say you would like to reward those employees disproportionately because they deserve it. Can you do that? Well of course you can!
Profit sharing contributions can be very flexible. I counsel my clients all the time around the many different ways you can allocate a profit sharing contribution, but there are some things to know. First, however the allocation is made, it must be in writing, which means we need to amend the plan (probably) which means we need to do this before year end. And depending upon how the plan provides for the accrual of benefits, we might have even passed the date that changes can be made for this year.
How are you to know what your options are and if the plan can be modified to meet your business needs? You need to work with a plan design expert who can walk you through your options. You need to work with me! Please give me a call…before it’s too late!
Pete Welsh a/k/a 401kGuy
Are you worried about cyber-security breaches? You should be! It seems to be happening all around us all the time. There is almost no end to the number of bad guys that want our data, and when that data is attached to money, it is even more appealing.
And for every data breach, there are thousands of attempts that have been thwarted. The breaches are what make the headlines, but I can assure you that all financial services firms are getting hit hundreds, if not thousands of times A DAY by cyber crooks trying to break through. One common point of entry is stealing employee data and pretending the crook is the employee to gain access to the retirement account of the employee. 401k Recordkeepers deal with this on a daily basis.
I wanted to write today to bring to light a common practice in the administration of a 401k plan that might sneak up on many companies. It is often the case that companies are asked to approve distribution requests on behalf of terminated employees. These approval requests can come from either the recordkeeper or the TPA on the plan. Attached to these emails is generally a distribution form with the terminated employee’s information, including address, date of birth, and Social Security Number. Talk about a crook’s dream come true.
What is particularly sneaky about these requests is that even if the email goes to the employer encrypted, the employer doesn’t always send it back encrypted. This is a weakness and one of which employers should be aware.
Are you an employer who is approving distribution request from terminated employees? How about approving loans for existing employees? Hardship withdrawals? Doing all this over the email system with confidential employee data, are you? Don’t think the bad guys will ever find out?
There are several areas of potential security breaches when operating a retirement plan. If you are a company that would like to ensure you are doing what you can to protect your employees’ data, give me a call. I would love to walk you through a checklist to make sure you are being as careful as possible.
Pete Welsh a/k/a 401kGuy
Now few people are against making more money, so I am not going to suggest that making more is a bad thing. At almost any wage level, people generally lift their gaze to the next level up and begin to think what life would be like if only they were there. Fortunately, many people do move up the salary scale over the course of their careers and often hit peak earning years in their 50s.
However, one common misconception about earning more money is that money alone will result in less stress and financial worry. Some new research out from the Salary Finance suggests that this is just not the case. Salary Finance interviewed over 10,000 employees recently on a variety of Financial Fitness measures. The report is voluminous, and it isn’t possible to cover all the topics mentioned, but the idea that earning more relieves stress is so ingrained in our DNA, that I thought I would use some of the research here to debunk it.
We should start by saying that there is a level of earning below which extreme stress is omnipresent. If a person is earning below subsistence level, stress will be experienced. So let’s for argument sake not consider that low of a level of income. For Salary Finance, they interviewed people at all levels and found that 58% of individuals earning between $25-40k have financial worries. That probably doesn’t surprise any of us.
What was interesting is that 40% of the people earning between $160-200k also have financial worries. Wouldn’t you think the percentage should be much less for this higher income earning group? I bet if you asked someone making $30k if they would have financial stress if they were making $180k, for example, they would say Heck No! But yet, the stress is present to a surprising extent.
So if money alone does not reduce financial stress and worry, what does? It appears that the number one difference is that people with less stress are Planners, using the language of Salary Finance. What is a Planner? Well, it’s someone who lives within their means, has emergency savings on hand, and focuses on long-term financial goals. In short…a Planner!
If you are an employer who would like to help your employees move from Coping to Planning, and thereby maybe not think that you paying them more alone is going to solve their problems, give me a call. I would love to have a discussion about how we can improve the financial lives of your employees.
Pete Welsh a/k/a 401kGuy